Featured Case: Brendan Dassey

Featured Case: Brendan Dassey

brendandassey
Brendan Dassey

Brendan Dassey was convicted in Wisconsin on March 17,2007, of first-degree intentional homicide, mutilation of a corpse, and first-degree sexual assault. Dassey was sentenced to life in prison, with a chance for early release in 2048. The victim was 25-year-old Teresa Halbach. Dassey’s uncle, Steven Avery, was also convicted of murdering Halbach, but the two were tried separately. Avery, who was already proven to have been wrongfully convicted in a prior case in the same county, after serving 18 years as an innocent man, has denied any involvement in the murder. Avery’s supporters argue that the same police force who wronged him the first time, set out to frame him once again in an attempt to avoid paying out millions of dollars to settle a civil suit resulting from his wrongful conviction.

During their murder investigation, police questioned Brendan Dassey, then a 16-year-old high school student, looking to find information about his uncle, Steven Avery, the lead suspect in their case. Interrogation recordings show that Dassey was coerced into making false statements which were then used against him to secure his conviction. The recent debut of the Netflix documentary Making A Murderer, which details the murder of Teresa Halbach and the controversy surrounding the case, has brought renewed attention to the decade-old case. The series has left many wondering if Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey had anything at all to do with the crimes they are charged with.

Injustice Anywhere has reviewed the Brendan Dassey case and has determined it to be a clear cut case of wrongful conviction. Dassey’s interrogation recordings provide a casebook example of a coerced confession. Sadly, Dassey was horribly mistreated by his public defender as well. Dassey did not receive a proper defense, instead he was coached by his attorney to say he was guilty. The attorney even had his own investigator instruct Dassey on how to draw images of the crime scene that would  support the prosecution’s arguments. Dassey is seen acting clearly confused during the recorded session, which irritates the investigator, prompting him to give orders to Dassey telling him exactly what he needs to draw, providing all of the necessary details along the way.

There is no evidence against Dassey, beyond his statements to police. He had ineffective counsel, making it it impossible for him to receive a fair trial. At the very least, Dassey deserves a new trial.

Please visit our website www.freebrendan.org to learn more about this case.

 www.freebrendan.org

 

SHARE
  • Bernard Phillips

    Brendan Dassey is totally guilty, he confessed, he has no alibi, no one in his family is standing up for him, they all know he is guilty. He’ll never get out of prison.

  • Tom Ihlenfeld

    Dassey’s mother is grandstanding about his wrongful interrogations. Give me a break, Where the F—k was she? Why was she not in the room with him? Why did she allow it without an Attorney present?. Her stupidity and ignorance got her son convicted. Had it been my son, I would be damned if he was in a room alone being questioned. Was she not sitting in the next room? If she were any kind of parent, Dassey may not be sitting in prison. The judicial system is not responsible for her being a lousy parent. She needs to shut the hell up, That being said, I think he freely offered much of the information and I personally think he is guilty as hell.

  • some who cared about the kids

    To both commenters TI and BP Your town is made up of totally biased residents if neither of you believe this uncovered crap from your officials. Neither is guilty ! we need justice for all ………….

  • DarthYan

    Except the confessions were clearly coerced. False confessions happen